1) The Discovery
The crystal clear solar system wide climate discovery by
Dr. Ned Nikolov and Dr. Karl Zeller is based on official NASA space
probe data. They used advanced mathematical
analysis techniques to study the climates of rocky surfaced planets and
moons in our solar system. They found they could accurately
predict their long term average surface temperatures by knowing just
two strategic facts: their distance from the Sun and their atmospheric
pressure. This formula has worked correctly for Mercury, Venus,
Earth, Mars, and Pluto, and for Earth’s moon, Europa, Callisto, Titan,
and Triton. Their predictions have been proven accurate to within
one degree Celsius. Like the value of Pi, this mathematical
relationship will never go away because it was created by Nature, not
Nikolov and Zeller found that the specific gaseous
composition of the atmospheres
of planets and moons are irrelevant to determining their long-term
average surface temperatures. For example, the atmosphere of
Venus is composed of 96.5% carbon dioxide, while Earth’s atmosphere
contains only .04% carbon dioxide, yet that information was not even
needed to predict temperature. The logical conclusion is that
atmospheric gases only contribute to warming by their physical mass,
which increases atmospheric pressure.
Schools teach that the carbon dioxide rich atmosphere of
Venus creates a powerful greenhouse effect that keeps surface
temperatures hot enough to melt lead: about 462 degrees Celsius.
The new evidence suggests that heat is actually produced by Venus’s
proximity to the Sun and the weight of its atmosphere, which is over 90
times heavier than Earth’s. Venus’s tremendous atmospheric
mass produces crushing atmospheric pressure, which generates intense
Gas compression heating in a diesel engine eliminates the need for a
spark plug. Atmospheric gas compression heating due
to gravity keeps the Earth warm, not the infrared radiative properties
of the so-called "greenhouse gases." Carbon dioxide
has no special role in controlling Earth
temperatures. Nikolov and Zeller suggest that "the
greenhouse effect" be replaced by the term
"atmospheric thermal enhancement."
Obvious atmospheric heating due to air compression
occurs regularly in Brookings, Oregon, which is famous for the
"Brookings effect" weather phenomena, also known as a katabatic
wind. Winds sweep down from the coastal mountains at high speed
which causes atmospheric compression at sea level. This causes
the air to heat up, which often makes Brookings warmer than lower
latitude towns on the California coast. Gravity driven
atmospheric compression heating happens everywhere on Earth at all
times. We do not notice it because it is a continuous
phenomenon. Without it, our oceans would freeze to the Equator.
2) The Secret
Dr. Nikolov points out that the greenhouse gas theory
violates the Energy-Conservation Law in trying to explain the
atmospheric thermal effect exclusively through radiation.
Specifically, the total amount of short wave solar radiation absorbed
by the Earth is about 240 watts per square meter. The measured
long wave radiation coming down from our atmosphere is about 343 watts
per square meter. This downward long wave radiation has been
falsely assumed to be due to greenhouse gases absorbing long wave
radiation emitted by the Earth’s surface as it heats up through short
wave radiation bombardment from the Sun. We thus have 43% more
energy coming down from the atmosphere than all the energy received
from the Sun in total. The most likely cause of this excess
energy is gas compression heating, not the greenhouse effect, which by
definition can only help contain energy created by the Sun.
atmospheric IR (infrared) back radiation as an external heating energy flux to the
surface is like viewing the observed apparent rotation of celestial
bodies "around" Earth as a "proof" that Earth was at the center of the
Universe, a mistake made for 1000 years!" — Dr. Ned Nikolov
3) The Fallacy
Former NOAA climate scientist, Dr. Rex J. Fleming, stated that "there is no propensity for CO2 to store heat in a systematic way over time to produce a climate change effect." A greenhouse has glass walls that blocks
convective heat exchange with the surrounding environment, thus
insulating the air inside. Earth's atmosphere has no walls, so
convective cooling acts as an escalator transferring heat from the
surface of the Earth all the way up to the stratosphere. The
commonly used greenhouse gas theory analogy to a parked car’s
windshield is therefore false.
Ask yourself; does the warm carbon dioxide rich smoke from
a campfire make the fire hotter or act as insulation holding in the
heat? Rapid convective cooling overpowers any infrared radiative
effects of gases in our atmosphere, so no free flowing gas can act as
insulation. Trying to build a greenhouse out of gas is like
trying to build a canoe out of barbed-wire.
Ask yourself; why is the top of Mount Everest always
colder than the bottom of Death Valley? The answer is that
compression heating is obviously lower at higher altitudes where the
air is thin. Lower pressure means lower
The greenhouse gas theory was first proposed in the 19th Century as a
conjecture without observational evidence. It later became
"settled science" through repetition by many generations of scientists
quoting their mentors and peers. Only computer projection models formulated with erroneous assumptions
and cult like zealotry keep the man-made climate change bandwagon going.
4) The Evidence
Earth’s climate history does not reveal any evidence of
carbon dioxide increasing Earth’s temperatures as a “greenhouse
gas.” The temperature increase Earth experienced after the end of
the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1870) up to about 1940 was not caused by
man-made greenhouse gas emissions because industrial output during
those years was too low to make any significant difference.
Therefore, the heat waves and drought that caused the Dust Bowl of the
1930s had nothing to do with fossil fuels.
Industrial output and CO2 emissions increased dramatically during World
War II and during the post-war economic boom, but the Earth's
temperature dropped after 1940 until about 1975. By the early
1970s the weather had become so cold that there was fear of a coming
ice age. If CO2 was the driving force behind temperature
increases, the Earth would have experienced vigorous heating during the
50s, 60s, and 70s, not the remarkable cooling that actually occurred.
When the world dramatically increased biofuel farming during the Bush
and Obama administrations, CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions
rose as a result of deforestation, land use change, and increased
fertilizer production, yet Earth's global temperature remained flat
instead of rising. That fact goes counter to the basic premises of the
man-made global warming hypothesis.
Father and son scientists, Dr. Michael Connolly and Dr.
Ronan Connolly, conducted a historic review of global weather balloon
data going back for many years, and they came to the following
“It doesn’t matter whether we
double, triple, or even quadruple the carbon dioxide
concentration. Carbon dioxide has no impact on atmospheric
“We carried out new laboratory
experiments, and analyzed the data from millions of weather balloons to
calculate exactly how much global warming carbon dioxide was causing.
When we did this, we discovered that the answer was zero.”
turns out that some of the assumptions used in man-made global warming
theory had never actually been
tested. When we tested them, we discovered that they were invalid."
"unusual global warming" that has caused such concern is not unusual,
after all. We found that the world naturally switches between
periods of global warming and periods of global cooling, with each
period lasting several decades."
SEE Balloons in the Air: Understanding Weather and Climate video on YouTube with historically dramatic moments starting at the 50-minute point. Their website contains all the scientific data and details.
A study by Dr. Jyrki Kauppinen and Dr. Pekka Malmi,
from the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Turku
in Finland, found that the IPCC’s computer generated climate models fail
to consider the very strong influence of solar mediated low cloud cover
changes on global temperature. The authors state that the IPCC’s
results cannot be considered valid experimental evidence. SEE No Experimental Evidence For The Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change
Chinese archaeological based study has found that atmospheric carbon
dioxide levels have no effect on climate. Dr Wu Jing, from the
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, discovered that
China’s winters have been warming since 4,000 BC. Dr. Wu Jing
stated that the “Driving forces include the sun, the atmosphere, and
its interaction with the ocean.” Dr. Wu Jing's group of
scientists concluded that “We have detected no evidence of human
Wu Jing is currently worried about global cooling, not global warming.
She states that "A sharp drop of temperature will benefit
SEE China scientists warn of global cooling trick up nature’s sleeve
5) The Past
This new evidence helps explain our planet’s history. During the
Jurassic Period, about 200 million years ago, Earth was significantly
warmer with tropical plants growing in polar regions. Dinosaurs
ruled the land while pterodactyls roamed the skies. Pterodactyls
were large winged reptiles that flew like birds despite their heavy
bone structure. Flight would be impossible in today’s relatively
thin atmosphere, but when pterodactyls existed our atmosphere must have
been much denser; perhaps up to three times as dense. The greater
the air density, the greater the aerodynamic lift, and the greater the
6) Correcting Misconceptions
Air pollution lowers temperatures instead of raising them
because pollution blocks sunlight and reflects it back into
Space. That is why volcanic eruptions cause global cooling.
net effect of having water in all three phases (solid, liquid, gas) on
Earth is cooling, because clouds block and reflect sunlight.
Water dramatically affects weather and the distribution of
heat, but it does not cause total global planetary warming.
unscientifically brand carbon dioxide as a “pollutant,” forgetting the
obvious proven fact that carbon dioxide created and feeds all life on
Earth — and most likely — all life that exists anywhere in the
universe. Adding more CO2 to our atmosphere makes plants grow
faster, bigger, and more resistant to drought, which produces more food
and lumber. NASA satellite observations have shown this is
already happening around the world. If we want to make Earth
warmer, we will have to either significantly increase total atmospheric
pressure or permanently reduce global cloud cover, both daunting tasks
beyond our capabilities.
7) Renewable Energy
Windmills and solar schemes have been financial and
ecological disasters all over the world, causing far more harm than
good, and without any benefit to our climate. Needlessly
increasing the cost of electricity hurts the poor the most.
Global biofuel farming has raised the cost of fertilizer, farmland, and
food all over the world. It has increased topsoil erosion,
deforestation, water pollution, phosphate resource depletion, and
deaths due to malnutrition and related illness. By even the most
conservative estimates, global biofuel farming has killed far more
people over the last twenty years than all wars and acts of terrorism
combined. Malnutrition is the primary worldwide cause of
avoidable mental retardation in children, but environmentalists and
politicians do not seem to care. Pesticides used on biofuel crops
are a major cause of the worldwide kill-off of bees and other
The obvious political, financial, and religious motives
for spreading climate hysteria are the real drivers of our irrational
anti-carbon policies, not science. Doomsday religions
the dawn of man, and climate hysteria is an ancient phenomenon that has
plagued our past. Five hundred years ago the weather was so
extreme that Europeans burned alive thousands of people accused of
being "weather witches." Through "weather cooking" they were believed
to have caused terrifying storms that destroyed crops and killed farm
animals. Only a few citizens objected to burning their neighbors and
using torture to gain confessions. The dissenters believed that weather
is controlled by Nature, not by man. If you express those exact
sentiments today even United States senators and congressmen will brand
you a "denier," a term historically used in different forms by
virtually all intolerant religions around the world. See Dr. Baliunas on Weather Cooking (YouTube video).
Scientists — devout true believers — at NASA,
NOAA, and the IPCC have been caught distorting data to increase our
level of anxiety. You can argue with science, but you cannot
argue with religious fervor. Thus, we see the Orwellian spectacle
of Americans protesting “global warming” during record cold and snow,
and after Niagara Falls froze two winters in a row. Humans are
18.5% carbon by weight, eat carbon based food, and live in homes made
with carbon. A war against carbon is a war against the essential fuel of life our own families.
9) The Bottom Line
The Nikolov-Zeller formulas have been examined by
scientists around the world, and no one has been able to find flaw in
their mathematics, only displeasure in what their discovery
means. It means this whole charade of dangerous man-made global
warming has been much ado about nothing. It makes famous
politicians, scientists, and celebrities look like charlatans and fools, and puts in
jeopardy a trillion dollar renewable energy business, which has become
a vampiric drain on humanity rather than a savior. Nikolov and
Zeller have not been rewarded for making the greatest discovery in
climatology of the twenty-first century. Instead, they have faced
censorship, mud throwing, and deafening-silence from world leaders who
should use this new information to develop productive energy polices
that will dramatically elevate the human standard of living
To fully understand the Nikolov-Zeller climate discovery, please follow these easy steps.
1) Watch New Solar System Climate Discovery on YouTube (26 minutes).
2) Listen to a radio interview, Challenging the Greenhouse Theory,
and concentrate on what Nikolov and Zeller actually say.
Understand that in a world dominated by the Orwellian climate change
religion, Nikolov and Zeller do not have many options to speak publicly
about their finding. They would be happy to go on 60 Minutes and
explain everything, but the daring duo face a wall of censorship.
3) Read New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect (2017)
4) See the Nikolov-Zeller slide show
5) See Ned Nikolov's Twitter webpage with fascinating scientific details and information about NASA and NOAA's ongoing data faking scandals.