LFTRs produce electric power
via a waterless gas
turbine system that can use helium, carbon dioxide, or nitrogen gas.
The
reactors are small and air cooled, so they can be installed anywhere,
even
in a desert. Robert Hargraves, an LFTR advocate, states that "Liquid
fluoride thorium reactors operate at high temperature for 50%
thermal/electrical
conversion efficiency, thus they need only half of the cooling required
by
today's coal or nuclear plant cooling towers." LFTRs
with an output capability as high as 100 megawatts can be
manufactured on an assembly line, dramatically lowering costs and
enabling
electricity generation at a lower cost than any other new construction
power source. That means lower than new construction natural gas,
coal, geothermal and hydroelectric power, as well as being vastly more
affordable than unreliable wind and solar projects. Multiple
reactors can be
installed
at one location and connected to a single control room. With
convenient
modular design, LFTRs can be transported in pieces by truck or barge
for
easy assembly on site. This allows for swift construction with
reliable
results, avoiding delays and cost overruns. Rapid assembly line
construction also allows for easy updating of the design, which will
improve
over time like the dramatic evolution of automobiles, airplanes, and
computer
chips.
A LFTR can never
meltdown,
because its fuel is already
in a molten state by design. Any terrorists who obtained forceful
entry
into the reactor complex could not realistically remove any of the hot
molten
fissionable fuel. Coolant in LFTRs is not pressurized as in light
water
reactors, and the fuel arrives at the plant pre-burned with fluorine, a
powerful
oxidizer. This makes a reactor fire or a coolant explosion
impossible.
LFTRs do not require large, cavernous pressure vessels designed
to
contain an internal explosion of superheated steam, so LFTR enclosures
are
tightly fitting and compact, which makes them less expensive. The
reactors
will be installed underground with a thick reinforced concrete cap,
making
an attack by a kamikaze airplane pilot ineffective. Any
overheating
of
a LFTR causes the molten salt fuel to naturally expand, which pushes
fuel molecules so far apart that nuclear fission can no longer take
place. This creates an inherent controlling negative feedback
which
keeps core temperatures stable.
Even
a total loss of operational reactor control would not cause disaster.
In
addition to the fuel's natural safety, any excess heat in the reactor
core
would automatically melt built-in freeze-plugs, causing the liquid fuel
to
drain via gravity into underground storage compartments where the fuel
would
then cool into a harmless, noncritical mass.
Thorium is more abundant
than tin, and the United States alone
has enough rich thorium deposits to last for many thousands of
years.
One pound of thorium can produce as much energy as 3 million pounds of
coal. A Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor is up to 200 times more
fuel efficient than a traditional Light Water Nuclear Reactor.
One 3.5"
diameter ball of thorium, about the size of an extra large apple, can
produce an amount of electricity equivalent to the yearly consumption
of one average American for about 8,000. years.
The fissile
uranium-233 produced in LFTRs is
unavoidably contaminated with
uranium-232, which would make producing an atomic weapon with the help
of a LFTR
very difficult even for a major superpower. Uranium-232 emits
intense
gamma rays, which
interfere with electronic devices needed to make atomic bombs
detonate. The presence of gamma rays also makes fabricating bomb
components hazardous without very complex and expensive remote
controlled equipment. Uranium-232 puts out such a strong, easily
detectable signal that any terrorist organization obtaining it would
immediately broadcast their
location to the world. Even uncontaminated uranium-233 is not a
good
candidate for bomb making, and any small nation wishing to joining the
nuclear club would find it far easier and cheaper to make bombs using
plutonium made in ordinary light water nuclear reactors.
France's
Reactor Physics
Group, Russia, Japan, and other
countries are currently conducting LFTR research. If the United
States
committed
a relatively modest amount of money to develop LFTRs in cooperation
with other nations, a fully operational TOTAL ENERGY
SOLUTION could be developed quickly,
because most
of
the basic research has already been accomplished and is well
proven.
Contrary to rumor, the liquid fluoride salts used in LFTRs are
not unusably corrosive, even at very high temperatures. Oak Ridge
National Laboratory conducted tests with a liquid salt reactor and
found that the 1" thick metal alloy used in the reactor vessel
corroded at a rate of just one micrometer
per year, an irrelevant amount in a reactor designed
to last no more than a hundred years. As the interior of the
reactor
vessel in a LFTR operates at normal atmospheric pressure levels, there
are no unusual mechanical forces applied to its walls other than the
ordinary
gravitational load of the fuel. Unfortunately, LFTR
research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory was ended in 1976
despite steady design progress in favor of funding the Liquid Metal
Fast Breeder Reactor (LMFBR).
Two promising carbon free alternatives
to fossil fuels
Please visit my main web page on energy, The Renewable
Energy Disaster.
Christopher Calder email = archive100 AT inbox DOT com
Christopher Calder is a nonprofit advocate for world food supply security with no financial interest in any energy related business.